WHO Team Evaluates UAE Hospital's Role in Gaza Rel
A WHO delegation commended the UAE field hospital in Gaza for aiding nearly 97,000 patients amid the
Photo:Reuters
The World Trade Organization (WTO) has finally brought into force a landmark deal aimed at stopping harmful fishing subsidies. After more than 20 years of debates and delays, the agreement officially began on Monday, marking the first WTO agreement to take effect since 2017. Supporters believe this deal is a vital step toward protecting fish populations and giving the oceans a chance to heal.
Why This Deal Matters
Around the world, governments spend billions of dollars each year to support their fishing industries. These subsidies often pay for fuel, equipment, and long voyages to faraway waters. While this might help fishermen in the short term, it has created a dangerous problem: overfishing.
Overfishing happens when too many fish are taken out of the ocean faster than they can reproduce. As a result, fish stocks drop sharply, and some species face the risk of disappearing. This hurts not only the environment but also millions of people who depend on fish for food and jobs.
According to a 2019 study, global subsidies for fishing reached $35.4 billion annually. The biggest contributors include China, the European Union, the United States, South Korea, and Japan. Much of this money allows fleets to travel far from home and fish in waters that might already be under stress.
What the Agreement Says
The new WTO deal makes it illegal for governments to give subsidies for fishing activities in two main situations:
Overfished Stocks – If a species of fish is already in danger from overfishing, no subsidies can be used to catch them.
International Waters – Countries cannot provide subsidies for fishing in areas of the ocean that do not belong to any one nation.
To help poorer countries adjust, the agreement also creates a special fund. This fund will support developing nations as they make the shift to more sustainable fishing practices.
Megan Jungwiwattanaporn from the Pew Charitable Trusts said the agreement gives “fish stocks around the world a chance to recover, befitting local fishers who depend on a healthy ocean.”
A Long Struggle
This deal has not come easily. Negotiations began more than two decades ago. Countries argued over how much support should be cut, who should bear the cost, and what exceptions might be made for developing nations.
The agreement was first approved in 2022, but it needed support from two-thirds of WTO members to take effect. That final push came this week, thanks to Brazil, Kenya, Tonga, and Vietnam.
However, this is only the first stage. Negotiations are still stuck on other divisive issues, such as special exemptions requested by India and some developing countries. Without further progress, the current deal will expire in four years.
Global Reactions
For activists and environmental groups, this news is a rare victory. For years, they have warned that the oceans are running out of fish. If nothing changed, future generations might inherit empty seas. The new agreement offers hope, even if it does not solve everything at once.
For governments, the deal is also a sign that the WTO can still play an important role in global trade and cooperation. In recent years, the organization has struggled with disagreements between major economies, rising tariffs, and questions about its relevance. The success of this deal shows that consensus is still possible when the stakes are high.
The Road Ahead
While this agreement is historic, it is not enough on its own. The rules will need to be expanded in future talks to include more types of subsidies and stricter enforcement. Many fish species remain at risk, and oceans continue to face threats from pollution, climate change, and illegal fishing.
The next four years will be crucial. If countries can agree on stronger and more comprehensive rules, the deal could be extended and made permanent. If not, the progress made now could fade away.
Why Ordinary People Should Care
Fish are not just another product traded across borders. For billions of people, fish is a major source of protein. For many coastal communities, fishing is the main source of income. Healthy oceans also help regulate the planet’s climate and support countless forms of life.
When subsidies encourage overfishing, it is like spending money to destroy the very resource that people depend on. By reducing harmful subsidies, governments can protect both nature and human livelihoods.
Conclusion
The WTO’s deal on fishing subsidies is a long-awaited achievement. It sends a strong message that protecting the environment and supporting fair trade can go hand in hand. While challenges remain, the world now has a starting point to rebuild fish populations and restore balance to the oceans.
As Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala recently said, there is reason to be hopeful. If nations work together, this agreement can become the foundation for a healthier and more sustainable future for the seas.