Quebec’s newly appointed Education Minister, Sonia LeBel, has publicly stated she will maintain the three-tiered school system in the province and has no intention of restructuring how private, selective public (special programs), and regular public schools operate. This system, long criticized by equity advocates for perpetuating educational inequality, is reaffirmed by the minister as a complement rather than a replacement to the public education sector.
Her decision comes in the face of mounting debate about social stratification and school segregation in Quebec, where critics argue the three tiers deepen inequality and limit opportunity for disadvantaged students. This article explores the minister’s rationale, the structure of the system, criticisms and defense, comparative context, and what this reaffirmation means for Quebec’s education future.
Quebec’s education landscape is divided into:
Private schools — mostly government-subsidized, often with selective admission or additional tuition fees.
Public schools with special (selective) programs — public institutions that run enrichment, arts, international or accelerated programs, admitting students based on criteria or tests.
Regular public schools — no selection criteria, open enrolment, typically serving the general student population.
This structure means that some public schools operate with selective admission features, creating a layer between fully private and fully open public schooling.
This system evolved over decades under the belief that providing enriched or specialized public programs would help stem student migration to private schools. The rationale was to retain high-performing students in the public sector by offering enhanced educational tracks, thereby reducing pressure on private enrollment growth.
Private schools in Quebec receive substantial public subsidy per student, making them more accessible compared to models in other provinces. This subsidized private school model supports the tiered structure by making private education a viable alternative for families willing to invest in academic advantage.
Minister LeBel emphasized that private, selective public, and general public schools are complementary — private “complements the public sector,” rather than replacing it. She stated that families should have a choice, and criticized efforts to pit tiers against each other. According to her office, the current system supports student success across sectors without undermining public education.
LeBel declined in-depth media interviews but reiterated that she will not dismantle or restructure the three-tier framework, signaling continuity with past administrations that defended the tiered model.
The minister’s stance is grounded in several arguments:
Parental choice and autonomy: Families should be free to select a school that fits their child’s needs, even if that means private or specialized public tracks.
Diversity of educational offerings: Different tiers serve different educational missions — enriched programs, arts, language immersion — that may not be feasible in all regular public schools.
Preservation of public funding balance: By keeping all tiers operational, the government can maintain a balance between public reach and selective excellence without abolishing competitive options.
Critics argue that the three-tiered system entrenches socioeconomic and academic segregation. Students from wealthier families often access private or selective public tiers, leaving regular public schools with higher concentrations of students facing disadvantages or learning challenges. This “cream-skimming” effect clusters resources and motivated students in certain schools, widening disparity in outcomes.
Research by education observers and community advocates indicates that the tiered system correlates with lower rates of university access among students in regular public schools, compared to those in enriched or private tracks. Critics also raise concerns about diminishing equity and social mobility.
Various education experts, civil society organizations, and parent groups have repeatedly called for the dismantling or reform of the tiered system. They argue that true reform requires a common school network where students are not stratified by performance or family resources.
This debate intensifies in election years, as proposals emerge to unify public and private school frameworks under common standards or funding conditionalities.
Maintaining the tiered system invites political risk. As inequality discourse gains traction, the minister may face pressure from opposition parties, advocacy movements, and public campaigns demanding a more unified, equitable school system.
In most Canadian provinces, private schools operate outside public subsidies, making them relatively inaccessible to average families. Public schools are largely non-selective, with rare magnet or gifted-track programs. This less stratified approach contrasts with Quebec’s model, which subsidizes private education and embeds selective public tiers.
Some countries maintain stratified schooling systems — e.g., tracked secondary systems in parts of Europe — but many are now moving toward comprehensive models, de-tracking or abolishing streaming to reduce inequality.
Quebec’s tiered model is often cited by international critics as a cautionary example of how subsidized private and selective tracks can exacerbate inequality.
Families currently choosing private or selective public options will retain their choices.
Students in regular public schools may continue facing resource and outcome disparities if no reforms are introduced.
Those advocating for equity reforms may be disappointed; systemic equity improvements may need new policy levers.
Regular public schools may need stronger supports — funding, teacher quality, program innovation — to compete for student retention.
Policymakers may need to address stratification effects through resource redistribution, targeted interventions, or support for high-need schools.
Maintaining the status quo intensifies the need for advocacy around equity, access, and structural reform.
Efforts may shift toward school-level policy (e.g., curriculum, funding models) rather than broad system restructuring.
Policy proposals before elections: As provincial elections approach, education platforms may propose changes to the three-tier system.
Legislative initiatives: Watch for proposed bills or reforms aiming to modify funding, selection criteria, or integration across tiers.
Advocacy campaigns: Parent groups, equity organizations, and educational nonprofits may mobilize for reform, using data or public pressure.
Enrollment trends: Shifts in student movement between tiers — e.g., more migration to private or enriched programs — will reflect perceptions of system equity.
Data and reporting: New reports or transparency in performance, student outcomes, and socioeconomic stratification data will influence public discourse.
Disclaimer
This article is based on media reports and public statements as of October 2025 regarding Quebec’s education policy and the stance of Education Minister Sonia LeBel. Details may evolve and readers are encouraged to consult official Quebec education sources for the latest updates.
Nutritionist Deepsikha Jain recommends 1–2 tablespoons of flaxseeds—morning, before meals or as a sn
Dr. Rajiv Sood outlines five simple daily practices — activity, diet, stress care, sleep and check-u
Coconut water excels at fast rehydration after exercise; aloe vera juice supports digestion and skin
During a video call, 35-year-old Bisma Lalji's sudden back pain led to a Stage 4 breast cancer diagn
